统计211

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 3020|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

基因研究文献质量评价

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1
发表于 2011-9-3 09:03:58 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

The recent completion of the first draft of the human genome sequence and advances in technologies for genomic analysis are generating tremendous opportunities for epidemiologic studies to evaluate the role of genetic variants in human disease. Many methodological issues apply to the investigation of variation in the frequency of allelic variants of human genes, of the possibility that these influence disease risk, and ofassessment of the magnitude of the associated risk. Based on a Human Genome Epidemiology workshop, a checklist for reporting and appraising studies of genotype prevalence and studies of gene-disease associations was developed. This focuses on selection of study subjects, analytic validity of genotyping, population stratification, and statistical issues. Use of the checklist should facilitate the integration of evidence from these studies. The relation between the checklist and grading schemes that have been proposed for the evaluation of observational studies is discussed. Although the limitations of grading schemes are recognized, a robust approach is proposed. Other issues in the synthesis of evidence that are particularly relevant to studies of genotype prevalence and gene-disease association are discussed, notably identification of studies, publication bias, criteria for causal inference, and the appropriateness of quantitative synthesis. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:

300–10.

游客,如果您要查看本帖隐藏内容请回复

评分

参与人数 1统计币 +6 收起 理由
veil + 6

查看全部评分

分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友
收藏收藏 转播转播 分享分享 分享淘帖 支持支持 反对反对
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则


免责声明|关于我们|小黑屋|联系我们|赞助我们|统计211 ( 闽ICP备09019626号  

GMT+8, 2025-4-18 04:52 , Processed in 0.088376 second(s), 25 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表