er the defendant realty, then the defendant within or above with the plaintiff there is a special relationship between such as contract relations, the defendant because this special relationship to the plaintiff shall bear reasonable duty of care, measures must be taken to protect lawful entrants safety or the property security, make them against the realties or above within existing objects or environmental harm; Otherwise, shall not fulfilling its reasonable control obligation to legitimate entrants assume tort liability. However, China's judicial precedents and not the defendant to legitimate entrants assumes the duty of care of form to specify. Therefore, it is necessary to explore from treatis on. This paper that real estate right person to legitimate entrants bear reasonable duty of care for their displays in: engaged in the dangerous activity bear reasonable notice obligation, to prevent their dangerous activity damage the interests of others; To the known dangerous bear reasonable Louis Vuitton Uk warning obligation; For unknown dangerous bear reasonable check and find obligations. (2) real estate right assumes the duty of care range 1, abnormally dangerous warning obligations Real estate right person to legitimate entrants assumes the duty of care of real estate right person to take reasonable request measures to protect the entrants from unreasonable dangerous damage, if they don't take measures to protect the legitimate entrants from such dangerous damage, then, when the lawful entrants suffer unreasonable damage dangerous damage, real estate right owner shall assume tort liability for damages. On, people will not reasonable damage dangerous called abnormally dangerous (unusual danger). So-called abnormally dangerous, refers to the real estate right into the entrants who engaged in real estate within or above activity or complete their tasks will usually find danger. Therefore, entrant encounter danger is dangerous, only by entrants into real estate right owner realty within or Cheap Louis Vuitton above purpose to decide. Judicial precedents thinks generally, the danger is exceptionally dangerous: rehabilitation in very strange place set up the steps, Inside the village very gliding steps; Store the placement of steps because decayed and black, both sides armrest the customer to fall off, it is hard to see, In outdoor cinema audiences throw gulal out of fireworks explode, Food stores in unusual ways placed cardboard box. Some dangerous is dangerous, the standard is objective, should consider the specific circumstances of a case, including entrants species. For example, on a single man child may be abnormally dangerous risks might for his parents together children may not constitute dangerous, because when children and adult parents together, people expect pta remind children vigilant dangerous or prevent such hazard. [4] once the defendant within the realty or above exists abnormally dangerous, they will bear dangerous warning obligation, through reasonable way remind leg Louis Vuitton Outlet
